Apple’s Needleless Blood Sugar Tracker has an Uphill Battle in Front Of It > 자유게시판

본문 바로가기

최신 HTS MTS 지원

국내 최고 수준의 안정적인 매매환경 지원

Apple’s Needleless Blood Sugar Tracker has an Uphill Battle in Front O…

profile_image
George
2025-08-11 06:58 10 0

본문

monitor-of-vital-signs-in-the-operating-room.jpg?s=612x612&w=0&k=20&c=YezFocZiJP_bzo3yxbH37lgEDAziPUP3lE88_Gmu8Yw=Posts from this topic might be added to your each day email digest and your homepage feed. Posts from this topic can be added to your each day electronic mail digest and your homepage feed. Posts from this subject will be added to your daily electronic mail digest and your homepage feed. Posts from this author will be added to your each day electronic mail digest and your homepage feed. If you buy something from a Verge hyperlink, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement. Rumors are flying that Apple is developing some type of wearable that would constantly monitor the user’s blood sugar with out breaking their pores and skin. For individuals with diabetes, this would be an enormous enchancment over the somewhat invasive or downright painful choices they presently depend on. But specialists warn that if the rumors are true, BloodVitals tracker Apple might be facing a scientific and technological battlefield littered with many years of other companies’ failures.



If Apple is chasing a needleless blood sugar monitor, it wouldn’t be that shocking. In spite of everything, BloodVitals tracker the market would be large. About 30 million Americans have diabetes, a illness caused when there’s too much sugar, or glucose, in the blood. People with diabetes must fastidiously titrate their food intake, and even inject the hormone insulin in order to keep their blood sugar from spiking or dropping to harmful levels. So recurrently measuring blood glucose is key. Right now, it’s also unpleasant. People with diabetes have to prick their fingers to attract blood, or put on a monitor that inserts a tiny tube beneath their skin to repeatedly measure glucose in the fluid between cells (the same fluid that spills out while you pop a blister). So a needleless system - preferably one which continuously monitors glucose ranges and spits them out in real time - can be an enormous upgrade.



"That is the holy grail," says Eric Topol, BloodVitals SPO2 the director of the Scripps Translational Science Institute who also sits on the board of glucose monitor producer Dexcom. And that’s why so many earlier than Apple have made the attempt. Google tried to develop a contact lens to detect glucose in tears, but ever since pharmaceutical big Novartis licensed the technology in 2014, real-time SPO2 tracking the project’s gone quiet. "It’s an extremely tough downside," says Mark Rice, an anesthesiologist and diabetes professional at Vanderbilt University. "Everybody thinks they have a way to do it, and everyone, thus far, has failed." Why? The hurdles are many - so let’s speak about just a few of them. The first drawback is that there’s only about a sugar packet’s worth of glucose floating through the blood, writes knowledgeable John L. Smith in his ebook The Pursuit of Noninvasive Glucose: Hunting the Deceitful Turkey. So, there’s not loads of glucose to measure from the outset. The second drawback is that glucose is definitely a reasonably boring molecule.



It’s colorless, small, and it doesn’t have many distinguishing features. That’s why the present glucose tests use a chemical response to transform glucose into molecules which are simpler to trace, either because they've a colour, or as a result of they can generate electrical currents. These checks could be run at a clinical lab or, for the reason that 1970s, within the consolation of your private home using a glucometer. In each instances, you may have to attract blood - for glucometers, this is done by pricking your finger and urgent a drop to a test strip. Newer continuous glucose displays use a wire inserted beneath the pores and BloodVitals tracker skin that takes measurements each few minutes, BloodVitals tracker and might ship the outcomes onto a wise gadget, like your cellphone or Apple Watch. Users still must prick their fingers, although, to calibrate the machine with the more correct measurements from a glucometer. Actually, both exams are not all the time completely accurate: the test strips can go off if they’re not saved appropriately; widespread medication like Tylenol can interfere with the chemical reaction; and microorganisms and tissue can gunk up the sensor in a steady monitor.



And that’s dangerous. Inaccurate outcomes may drive individuals to take insulin after they don’t need it or miss the signs of dangerously low blood sugar - which may lead to coma or even loss of life. The issue with a device like Google’s contact lens is that the physique likes to hold on to sugar. Sure, if blood sugar levels are too high, glucose will spill over into tears, spit, BloodVitals tracker sweat, or urine. But as blood sugar ranges drop, the physique holds on to this precious source of energy and stops leaking it into different fluids. This dooms the prospects of monitoring glucose from the bodily fluids you may access without puncturing the skin. Some have tried to get to that blister-filling liquid under the pores and skin without using a needle. Within the early 2000s, the FDA accepted a device known as the GlucoWatch. It used a low electrical present to draw glucose proper out of the body, where it was measured by sensors on the again of a tight-fitting watch.

댓글목록0

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

댓글쓰기

적용하기
자동등록방지 숫자를 순서대로 입력하세요.
게시판 전체검색
메뉴 사이드바 회원 사이드바 회원 사이드바